On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 08:55 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > My reading was that he worried about *non-KDE* apps doing similar things > > without any interaction with Akonadi. > > > > So there are now two independant databases, one in KDE and one in Gnome. > > Those of us who use a mixture of apps are running both of them. > > If it matters, akonadi was designed to be DE-independent, with no kde > dependencies (other than qt). Is this because it uses qt to talk to the other KDE apps? Just curious. More to the point, my comment isn't about the relative merits of the various technologies. It's more in the sense that choice can carry costs which we may not always be aware of. poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
