Martín Marqués wrote:
> They could have used some lighter database engine, like sqlite.
They tried. It didn't work for them. The alternatives they had were trying
to get SQLite fixed and delaying Akonadi for a couple years or just using
MySQL which works now. I can't really blame them for their decision, even
if it means larger dependencies than strictly necessary (but that's really
the _only_ complaint you can make about that decision). It's not like
they're requiring you to do any administration work for that MySQL
instance.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
