On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Martín Marqués <martin.marques@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2009/2/16 Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> Andreas M. Kirchwitz wrote: >> >>> Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> > Took a quick look at http://pim.kde.org/akonadi/ and on the surface >>> > seems like a reasonable direction/idea. So, not quite sure as to why >>> > you may consider this to be a big issue. >>> >>> If every applications starts its own copy of mysql\ >> >> In this caes, it's one mysql instance for akonadi, which all akonadi-using >> apps will share (per user, by default). > > I think he was talking about other apps (non-KDE ones). Say I start > emacs and it want's to store cache and configuration info in a mysql > database, or I want to use rythmbox (which is a GNOME app) and GNOME > start's it's own mysql instance. > > IMHO, this is the beginning of the end of KDE Because some portions of it require a free database engine? Seriously? -- Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
