On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 15:51:20 -0500 (EST) fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx > > You can reach the person managing the list at > fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: KDE 4.2 and desktop icons (Anne Wilson) > 2. Re: Evolution versus Kmail. Was: First thoughts on KDE4.2... > (Anne Wilson) > 3. VirtualBox launch problem (Kirk) > 4. Re: VirtualBox launch problem (Mikkel L. Ellertson) > 5. Re: Firefox does not open .PNG files anymore (Konstantin Svist) > 6. Re: Evolution versus Kmail. Was: First thoughts on KDE4.2... > (Mail Lists) > 7. Re: kde 4.2 pulse audio eradicate (Minson, John M Mr CTR) > 8. Re: kde 4.2 pulse audio eradicate (Rex Dieter) > 9. Re: kde 4.2 pulse audio eradicate (Minson, John M Mr CTR) > 10. Re: Evolution versus Kmail. Was: First thoughts on KDE4.2... > (Kevin Kofler) > 11. Re: Evolution versus Kmail. Was: First thoughts on KDE4.2... > (Kevin Kofler) > 12. Re: KDE Update on x86_64 creates dependency hell... (Kevin > Kofler) 13. Re: Applications in KDE's "Lost & Found" folder (Kevin > Kofler) 14. Re: KDE 4.2 and desktop icons (Kevin Kofler) > 15. Re: Advice on changing to 64 bits (Kevin Kofler) > 16. Re: kde 4.2 pulse audio eradicate (Rex Dieter) > 17. Re: Evolution versus Kmail. Was: First thoughts on KDE4.2... > (Mail Lists) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 19:07:38 +0000 > From: Anne Wilson <annew@xxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: KDE 4.2 and desktop icons > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using > Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <200902141907.45886.annew@xxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On Saturday 14 February 2009 17:15:32 Marcelo Magno T. Sales wrote: > > Em S?b 14 Fev 2009, Patrick O'Callaghan escreveu: > > > On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 08:33 -0300, Marcelo Magno T. Sales wrote: > > > > Em S?b 14 Fev 2009, Adel ESSAFI escreveu: > > > > > Hi > > > > > I was very happy today morning when I found KDE 4.2 updated!! > > > > > > > > > > Once, someone tells me that with KDE 4.2, icons can be > > > > > directly be put on the desktop and we have not to use a > > > > > folder plugin to show desktop icons. > > > > > > > > Well, you still need the folder view for that, however now the > > > > entire desktop can be set as a folder view, so it behaves the > > > > way you want. > > > > > > No you don't. Right-click on the app in the Kicker menu and select > > > "Add to Desktop". > > > > Ok, but this will create a widget encapsulating the application's > > shortcut, as it has been possible to do since KDE 4.0. I understood > > he wanted something like a 3.5.x desktop, where files in a folder > > would appear as icons on the desktop. After all, this is the new > > behavior added in KDE 4.2, the one you describe is available since > > 4.0. > > > Clarification for those that are not yet using it. The KDE3 version > had Desktop as a special folder, yet looking at it in a file manager, > it was clearly the same as other folders in most respects. What you > see in a Plasma desktop is not a folder at all. Therefore, if you > want to be able to file documents, screenshots, and whatever on your > desktop, you have to use a folderview, in effect creating the Desktop > folder that you used to have. > > If all you want is launcher icons, though, PoC's method is better. > > Anne > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: not available > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 197 bytes > Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. > Url : > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20090214/058ea9bb/attachment.bin > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 19:09:57 +0000 > From: Anne Wilson <annew@xxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Evolution versus Kmail. Was: First thoughts on KDE4.2... > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using > Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <200902141910.15584.annew@xxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On Saturday 14 February 2009 18:59:04 Arthur Pemberton wrote: > > > > It's still considered a security risk, but you can flip a switch to > > enable it. Any by switch I mean checkbox. > > > Unfortunately, no. You have to flip a switch to disable it. That's > what I object to. > > Anne > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: not available > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 197 bytes > Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. > Url : > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20090214/8f2bdaa3/attachment.bin > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 12:11:00 -0700 > From: Kirk <kirk202@xxxxx> > Subject: VirtualBox launch problem > To: "fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP352EDFDB50B3029E50E797EFB90@xxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > I installed KVM and Virt and won't connect. I get an error msg: > > "Unable to open connection to Xen Hypervisor/Daemon" > - Verify Xen host kernel was booted > - The Xen servic has been started > > The details are: > > Unable to open connection to hypervisor URI 'xen:///': > <class 'libvirt.libvirtError'> unable to connect to > '/var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock': Connection refused > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/connection.py", line 483, > in _open_thread > None], flags) > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/libvirt.py", line 99, in > openAuth > if ret is None:raise libvirtError('virConnectOpenAuth() failed') > libvirtError: unable to connect to '/var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock': > Connection refused > > Kirk Ziegler > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:20:20 -0600 > From: "Mikkel L. Ellertson" <mikkel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: VirtualBox launch problem > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using > Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <49971974.6020401@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Kirk wrote: > > I installed KVM and Virt and won't connect. I get an error msg: > > > > "Unable to open connection to Xen Hypervisor/Daemon" > > - Verify Xen host kernel was booted > > - The Xen servic has been started > > > > The details are: > > > > Unable to open connection to hypervisor URI 'xen:///': > > <class 'libvirt.libvirtError'> unable to connect to > > '/var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock': Connection refused > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/connection.py", line > > 483, in _open_thread > > None], flags) > > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/libvirt.py", line 99, in > > openAuth > > if ret is None:raise libvirtError('virConnectOpenAuth() failed') > > libvirtError: unable to connect to '/var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock': > > Connection refused > > > > Kirk Ziegler > > > You subject is misleading. VirtualBox and KVM are different ways of > doing the same thing. They do not work well together. You may want > to resend the message with a better topic so that the people that > can help with the problem will see it. > > Mikkel I was under the impression that VirtualBox was a GUI interface for KVM. I removed KVM and still got the same message at launch. I don't know what other subject to put it under...help me understand to I can at least ask the right questions. Kirk -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
