On Monday 09 February 2009, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Mike Chalmers <mikechalmers70@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Nothing else makes as much sense to me in the open source world > >> that isn't a 'paid' or 'enterprise' edition. > > > > Mark we are definitely on the same page. Open source works > > together, so it is very understandable why a rolling release is > > good, imo. > > I hope you at least understand why a rolling release is > technically difficult, especially in a distro like Fedora where > things can change radically from one release to another. Probably majority of users would not complain about radical changes in these frequent upgrades IF new releases don't break something that people use and rely on every day. With Fedora it happens every release. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
