Craig White wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 08:34 +0000, M A Young wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, Craig White wrote:
rpm -ivh \
http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/linux/i386/adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.noarch.rpm
and then...
yum install flash-plugin libflashsupport
No, you do not want to install libflashsupport for Flash 10, and indeed it
can cause problems if you do. Flash 9 audio support had problems with
recent linux releases such as Fedora 9, which is why libflashsupport was
shipped with Fedora 9, since Flash 9 was the current version at that
point. These issues are resolved in Flash 10 so libflashsupport is no
longer necessary, and as the libflashsupport package in Fedora 9 is based
on Flash 9 code it can cause problems when used with Flash 10.
----
thanks for the clarification
Craig
I also send thanks for the additional information. Given all this, I am
beginning to think I might just kick the machine up to fedora 10 and
skip what appear to be problems in flash9 and fedora9's workarounds for
it. I'd probably be doing the upgrade in the next couple months anyway ...
Paul
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
