On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 06:07 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > JD wrote: > > Hey Arthur! Relax man!!! I agree with Ralf. Fedora IS ALWAYS a Beta!!! > > Actually all software, even if labeled "RELEASE" > > is always a beta. Why do you think there are always updates > > and fixes and new versions? > Pardon, that's not my point. > > I am not having much problems with seeing many updates/fixes, conversely > I would expect a distributor to fix each and every bug/problem they get > to know about, ASAP. > > My point is Fedora being shipped equipped with knowingly broken, > immature and incomplete pieces of SW having been made key-components of > the OS. ---- There are lots of 'stable' distributions available and perhaps your expectations would be better met by one of them instead. The notion of release early and often was the point of keeping fast paced development and yes, sometimes various package releases are premature and I sort of thought that was what the intent of a 'leading edge' distribution. Craig -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
