Trey Sizemore wrote: > On Mon Jan 19, 2009 09:35AM, Mike Chambers wrote: >> HP printers seem to be very well supported. Also I think Brothers >> printers are as well. I don't know about Lexmark, but they may be >> supported good now, or at least better than before. >> > > I'll second the HP and Brother recommendation. They have worked great > for me for a couple of years now. > > I'll continue to buy these brands. > I am running a Brother multi-function laser now, and I am very happy with it. Brother even has a program to monitor the function keys on the front of it. About the only thing I am not happy about it the way you have to "print" to the FAX. You have to put the dialing information in a file before faxing. Then again, I don't use the print-to-fax function often anyway. My only experience with HP is with their older printers, so I can not comment on current ones. I have used Lexmark, but I was not real happy with them. (Then again, I do not really like inkjets...) Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
