Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> I expect it's because having an xorg.conf is now discouraged, but as >> often >> happens, many of us have hardware that can't really do without it. I'm >> sure the day is coming - but it's not here yet :-) > > We will get there faster, if people report bugs when autoconfiguration > does not work. It doesn't yet on systems where the hardware reports it > incorrectly, returns junk data or no data at all for instance but we can > still make it work if we knew the hardware details. In a report, you can > file the output of lspci, /var/log/Xorg.log without a custom xorg.conf > and any further information you want to provide. > > system-config-display is a bandaid from the time when XFree86 was > stagnating badly but now that Xorg is going rapid development, it makes > sense to fix the underlying issues instead. I don't understand the anti xorg.conf argument. If in fact X can be set up automatically, then presumably xorg.conf can be written automatically. Then, in the hopefully few cases where this does not work, xorg.conf can be edited by hand. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
