On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Version 1.4.5 is kind of old.
The current version is: 1.5.1 (released May 23, 2008).
If one uses the same skin, it is difficult to distinguish (visually) audacious from xmms,
and audacious eats a lot more of CPU cycles.
Using top, in a quadcore Q6600 (4GB ram), xmms eats in the average 8% (peek of 12%) of CPU and audacious 14% (peek of 21%), both with the pulse plugin.
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 19:40:51 +0100, Marko wrote:Nowadays I'd rather point such people at Audacious (package "audacious"
> On Thursday 08 January 2009 01:17, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > And why in the world is anyone still using xmms, with it's hideous
> > gtk1 widget set and poor utf-8 support?
>
> It's simple to use, with easy user interface --- play, stop, pause, rew, ff,
> shuffle, repeat (and nothing else) on one window.
>
> It Just Works, "yum install xmms xmms-mp3 xmms-flac" and its ready to go.
>
> It is similar to WinAMP, very useful for windows2linux converts.
for Fedora and corresponding add-on packages at rpmfusion.org).
Version 1.4.5 is kind of old.
The current version is: 1.5.1 (released May 23, 2008).
If one uses the same skin, it is difficult to distinguish (visually) audacious from xmms,
and audacious eats a lot more of CPU cycles.
Using top, in a quadcore Q6600 (4GB ram), xmms eats in the average 8% (peek of 12%) of CPU and audacious 14% (peek of 21%), both with the pulse plugin.
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
