Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > That's odd though. I misspoke when I said shortly before F10, it was > shortly > before the F9 release that it started using passphrases against each > luks partition. Maybe there was something different about how your > partitions were setup that F9 couldn't handle, but F10 can. > > You can see that the passphrases aren't being saved (well at least that > saved ones aren't bing used) by entering an incorrect passphrase before > a correct one. You'll then get a warning message for each luks partition > that there is no key slot unlocked by that passphrase. > > Interesting! The F9 partitions were set up nominally using the same technique during the F9 install as I just did for F10 (except that I had previously randomised all the partitions just ahead of the original F9 install). The F10 install was a clean install over the F9 partitions but nothing additional was done. Either way I do like the current setup - I have not yet plugged in a test encrypted usbkey that I was playing with under F9, nor a luks encrypted CD that I prepared in F9. For the usbkey the system just asked for the passphrase after plugging in and then just mounted and was visible, so I hope this will be the same in F10. The encrypted CD was a pain in F9 and needed some commands entering to set up the mapping - certainly it would not just ask for the passphrase and mount - I am currently testing some other things on the encrypted laptop but I will do these tests hopefully before the weekend is out. Mike -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/F10-and-encrypted-partitions---positive-outcome-tp21264150p21266946.html Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
