Dear All FEDORA Users,
I am a new bir in fedora linux system as administrator.
Please tell me one thing.
In my fedora linux os server, i am not able to sshd service .
The thing is that, once I had to change the permissions of the files just in order to avoid the other users to explore the system, using chmod command. However, I have immediately changed the permissons again back.
Soon after that I could not log on to the fedora server systm using the ssh serverhostname username command.
When tried to run sshd service using service sshd restart, I got the folloeing errors shown below:-
Permissions 0755 for '/etc/ssh/ssh_host_dsa_key' are too open.
It is recommended that your private key files are NOT accessible by others.
This private key will be ignored.
bad permissions :ignore key:
/etc/ssh/ssh_host_dsa_key
Could not load host key : /etc/ssh/ssh_host_dsa_key
Disabling protocol version 2. Could not load host key
sshd: no hostkeys available --exiting
Please immedialtely let me know, what to fix in order to restart the service sshd.
Thanks,
Jyotishmaan Ray Moderator Of Paradise Groups
--- On Mon, 12/22/08, fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx <fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx <fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: fedora-list Digest, Vol 58, Issue 254
To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Monday, December 22, 2008, 4:24 PM
Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or
body 'help' to
fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx
You can reach the person managing the list at
fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: changing 'hosts' to get my machine name ? (Thomas Cameron)
2. Re: changing 'hosts' to get my machine name ? (William Case)
3. Strange network problem in fc 10 (William W. Austin)
4. RE: FC10 does not boot when HDD moved to another machine
(Frank Millman)
5. Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win? (Mike Cloaked)
6. Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win? (Arthur Pemberton)
7. RE: FC10 does not boot when HDD moved to another machine
(Frank Millman)
8. Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win? (Mike Cloaked)
9. awesfx missing - can't load soundfonts (Paul (draeath))
10. Re: /etc/profile (Paul (draeath))
11.
Re: awesfx missing - can't load soundfonts (Michael Schwendt)
12. flash-plugin installed and not available (William Case)
13. fedora login window (Alain Roger)
14. Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win? (Kevin Kofler)
15. Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win? (Kevin Kofler)
16. Re: fedora login window (John Austin)
17. Re: PackageKit has eaten my system (again!) (Anne Wilson)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 23:38:21 -0600
From: Thomas Cameron <thomas.cameron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: changing 'hosts' to get my machine name ?
To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using
Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <494F27CD.9030007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
William Case wrote:
> Hi;
>
> This is an old stupid
question but I am stuck nonetheless. I have
> googled for several different ways but none work.
>
> I have changed my /etc/hosts file to:
> 127.0.0.1 CASE localhost.localdomain localhost
>
> This is the same as from my F9 /etc backup.
>
> CASE is the name of my machine. None of my programs seems to recognize
> it except 'hostname' -s or -f. The same problem with
> localhost.localdomain. I have changed it manually before in earlier
> Fedora versions but now nothing seems to work. If I remember correctly
> there where two files that needed changing.
>
> I just installed F10 and must have missed Anaconda asking for my machine
> name.
>
Your hostname is set in /etc/sysconfig/network. /etc/hosts is only for
name resolution, although you should prbably set your hostname there as
well. You should use lower case for the hostname, some
apps don't grok
mixed or upper case.
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 01:01:54 -0500
From: William Case <billlinux@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: changing 'hosts' to get my machine name ?
To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using
Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <1229925714.3076.6.camel@CASE>
Content-Type: text/plain
Thanks Thomas;
On Sun, 2008-12-21 at 23:38 -0600, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> William Case wrote:
> > Hi;
> >
> > This is an old stupid question but I am stuck nonetheless. I have
> > googled for several different ways but none work.
> >
> > I have changed my /etc/hosts file to:
> > 127.0.0.1 CASE localhost.localdomain localhost
> >
> > This is the same as from my F9 /etc backup.
> >
> > CASE is
the name of my machine. None of my programs seems to
recognize
> > it except 'hostname' -s or -f. The same problem with
> > localhost.localdomain. I have changed it manually before in earlier
> > Fedora versions but now nothing seems to work. If I remember
correctly
> > there where two files that needed changing.
> >
> > I just installed F10 and must have missed Anaconda asking for my
machine
> > name.
> >
>
> Your hostname is set in /etc/sysconfig/network. /etc/hosts is only for
> name resolution, although you should prbably set your hostname there as
> well. You should use lower case for the hostname, some apps don't
grok
> mixed or upper case.
>
I set the hostname with lower case in network. Everything works fine --
I guess I just had a brain cramp or something. However, I had heard
that some programs
don't understand upper case hostnames. In F9 I
purposefully used CASE to see. I didn't hit one program that had a
problem. I wonder if that means the world has changed by now and a user
can get away with using upper case.
--
Regards Bill
Fedora 10, Gnome 2.24.2
Evo.2.24.2, Emacs 22.2.1
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:20:28 -0500
From: "William W. Austin" <waustin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Strange network problem in fc 10
To: Fedora List <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <1229923228.6098.0@baustin>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I have a strange (local) network problem in fc 10 which I never had in
fc9 on the same hardware (with same config files).
This machine serves as a proxy+firewall between about 10 other machines
on the local network (192. addresses - the # of machines varies
depending
on where laptops are) and the real world. There have
been no problems up through fc9 (fc2-9 worked fine). No hardware has
changed, and this is a clean install (I can swap boot drives in the
bios so am able to go back to fc9 to check if and compare). While on
fc9 the following work correctly, on fc10 the results are a little
different:
Under fc9:
+ The firewall+proxy machine can see all of the network printers
and ALL of the machines on the 192 network.
+ All Linux, windows, and Solaris machines on the 192 network
can see the firewall+proxy machine.
Under fc10:
+ The firewall+proxy machine can see all of the network printers
but CANNOT see the windows machines on the 192 network.
+ ONLY the non-windows machines on the 192 network can see the
firewall+proxy machine. (The windows machines can still see
each other AND can see everything except the firewall+proxy
box.
The files
/etc/hosts
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1
/etc/rc.d/rc.local
are identical between the fc9 root and the fc10 install.
None of the other machines (Linux or windows) has had any updates since
BEFORE the install of fc10.
The firewall+proxy machine can see all of the Linux machines on the
network, but none of the windows machines.
A packet sniffer can see the attempts to ping from both sides, but
there is never an answer in either direction.
Finally, I can boot to the fc9 root drive and the problem disappears,
while if I boot to the fc10 drive, it occurs repeatably.
Machine: Athlon 64 X2 6000+ CPU with 6 GB ram, mixed scsi and eide
drives.
Kernel: (fc10: same result with both kernel-2.6.27.7-134.fc10.x86_64
and kernel-2.6.27.5-117.fc10.x86_64). {note: on fc9 it was the
2.6.27.7-53.fc9.x86_64 kernel}.
Glibc: glibc-2.9-3 (x86_64, i686, and i386 installed).
Any pointers as to what I might try to find a solution here would be
greatly appreciated, as I've spent many hours reading and going over
everything I could think of - with no luck.
I suspected a problem with SE linux, so as a test, I took the firewall
+proxy machine off the internet (no connection), disabled selinux, and
rebooted. The results were (as expected) unchanged. (And it's back in
place now, although I thought the disk relabeling would take
forever...).
I really don't think this is a bug - scanning through bugzilla didn't
find any pointers. I suspect cockpit error (mine), but I can't
identify it so far. Please help.
Thanks
--
william w. austin waustin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
"life is just another phase i'm going through. this time,
anyway
..."
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 08:56:50 +0200
From: "Frank Millman" <frank@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: FC10 does not boot when HDD moved to another machine
To: "'Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using
Fedora.'" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <20081222065744.D84C23F4396@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
>
> What does
>
> rpm -qa --queryformat
> "%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}.{ARCH}\n"|grep kernel|sort
>
> return?
>
> Also, what do you have in /etc/grub.conf?
>
> Sorry. It is
>
> rpm -qa --queryformat
> "%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}.%{ARCH}\n" | grep kernel |
sort
>
kernel-2.6.27.5-117.fc10.i686
kernel-2.6.27.7-134.fc10.i686
kernel-firmware-2.6.27.7-134.fc10.noarch
kerneloops-0.12-1.fc10.i386
As mentioned to Mikkel, /etc/grub.conf is a link to /boot/grub/grub.conf,
but there is no grub directory in /boot.
I cannot remember if there was one after installation, but I got the feeling
that a couple of things changed after I moved the HDD to the second machine
and selected 'Install/Upgrade'. I got the following message -
Warning: The partition table on device sda (ATA ST38410A 8213 MB) was
unreadable. To create new partitions it must be initialized, causing the
loss of ALL DATA on this drive. This operation will override any previous
installation choices about which drives to ignore.
I did not proceed past this point, but afterwards I noticed that the
contents of /etc/fstab had changed.
Before, it looked like this -
/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00
/ ext3 defaults 1 1
UUID=b6c62c5a-0afb-4258-a726-6a377a6f3b9e /boot ext3 defaults 1 2
tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
devpts /dev/pts devpts gid=5,mode=620 0 0
sysfs /sys sysfs defaults 0 0
proc /proc proc defaults 0 0
/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01 swap swap defaults 0 0
Afterwards, it changed to this -
UUID=6e47e294-fc8d-4457-b1e9-03f68a57d0aa / ext3 defaults 1 1
tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
devpts /dev/pts devpts gid=5,mode=620 0 0
sysfs /sys sysfs defaults 0 0
proc /proc proc defaults 0 0
UUID=519e0658-aa0a-49a2-9b39-d80e92b0c838 swap swap defaults 0 0
I don't know if any of this is significant.
Thanks
Frank
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 23:34:53 -0800 (PST)
From: Mike Cloaked <mike.cloaked@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome
win?
To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <21123826.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Armin Moradi wrote:
>
>
> That argument is really old. Nowadays with the great work of the KDE
> SIG, Fedora is
> as much KDE centred as it is focused on GNOME. You see little to no
> difference between
> them these days!
>
>
>From reports it looks like KDE4.2 will be really nice - but I wonder which
desktop Linus is using at the moment?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/is-KDE-dead---did-Gnome-win--tp21118075p21123826.html
Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 01:44:16 -0600
From: "Arthur Pemberton" <pemboa@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?
To:
"Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using
Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID:
<16de708d0812212344n4f5e26bag84f7e483b32e762c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 1:34 AM, Mike Cloaked <mike.cloaked@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
>
>
> Armin Moradi wrote:
>>
>>
>> That argument is really old. Nowadays with the great work of the KDE
>> SIG, Fedora is
>> as much KDE centred as it is focused on GNOME. You see little to no
>> difference between
>> them these days!
>>
>>
>
> >From reports it looks like KDE4.2 will be really nice - but I wonder
which
> desktop Linus is using at the moment?
I fail to see the importance of what desktop environment a kernel
hacker is using. Unless of course you're a kernel hacker
yourself.
Even then, the DE is entirely userspace.
--
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
( www.pembo13.com )
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:45:24 +0200
From: "Frank Millman" <frank@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: FC10 does not boot when HDD moved to another machine
To: "'Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using
Fedora.'" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <20081222074618.2DEFD3F4396@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>
> Frank Millman wrote:
> >
[...]
> > I ran mkinitrd on the original machine, just to see if it
> would work.
[...]
>
> > I don't know how to tell it to use the new image. Is there a way
to
> > change boot options without booting off the installation dvd and
>
> selecting 'rescue mode'? I did boot in rescue mode, and tried
> > 'initrd=test.img' and 'initrd=/boot/test.img', but in
both cases it
> > said it could not find test.img.
> >
> You can edit the kernel line in Grub before it boots the
> kernel. If we have to go that route, we can cover it. (My
> brain is froze - I was out shoveling/snow blowing snow...)
>
As I mentioned before, there is no grub directory in /boot, so there is no
grub menu on bootup. I don't know why. All I can do is press <esc>
once
booting has started, and it changes from a progress bar to the old text
display, but there does not seem to be any place where I can add or change
boot options.
> You HAVE TO build the new initrd image on the new machine. If
> you build it on the old machine, it will have the drivers for
> the old machine. This not what you want. (The image
is the
> same as the one you are trying to boot off of now, and is not
> working.)
>
I did do this, and it seemed to build ok. However, I don't know how to tell
it to use the newly created image.
I did a search for '*grub*' on my system. It found a few files. The
following could be relevant -
1. /etc/sysconfig/grub
boot=/dev/sda
forcelba=0
2. /sbin/grub-install
I ran it, but it asked for an install_device. I prefer not to guess, so
I did not try any further.
For the record, 'ls /boot' looks like this -
config-2.6.27.7-134.fc10.i686
initrd-2.6.27.7-134.fc10.i686.img
System.map-2.6.27.7-134.fc10.i686
vmlinuz-2.6.27.7-134.fc10.i686
If I type 'umount /boot', it says '/boot: not mounted'. Is that
expected? As
mentioned in my reply to Paulo, /etc/fstab has changed. It used to contain
an entry for /boot, but now it does not. I am not sure
when it changed, but
I think it was when I selected Install/Upgrade on the second machine. I got
a warning message and did not proceed, but a couple of things seem to have
changed after that.
It is quite possible that my messing around has left things in a state which
makes it difficult to diagnose problems. If you would like me to re-install
from scratch on the first machine and start the whole process again, I will
try that. I think it is worth persevering with this exercise to prove a
point. Hopefully others may find it of benefit as well.
Any more suggestions will be appreciated.
Thanks
Frank
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 23:53:38 -0800 (PST)
From: Mike Cloaked <mike.cloaked@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?
To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <21123952.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>
>
> I fail to see the importance of what desktop environment a kernel
> hacker is using. Unless of course you're a kernel hacker yourself.
> Even then, the DE is entirely userspace.
>
>
I guess it is not important but possibly interesting to know his thoughts
since I read some time ago that Linus was a long time avid fan of KDE. I
wondered if he still is a KDE(4) fan, as he uses Fedora I was told, that was
all.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/is-KDE-dead---did-Gnome-win--tp21118075p21123952.html
Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:56:19 +0100
From: Paul (draeath) <no-reply-gw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: awesfx missing - can't load soundfonts
To:
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <1d32ce3497adbc7f8d5c54e34b009d92@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I can't find the awesfx package for Fedora 10, and nothing in the Fedora or
RPMFusion repositories provides the file "*/asfxload" or
"*/sfxload"
These executables are REQUIRED for loading samples into an EMU10k
soundcard's wavetable synth, and hence are required for hardware MIDI
support.
Where did this package go? If I remember, Fedora 8 had it for instance.
I've tried building it myself to no avail.
Does anyone know where I can find an x86_64 awesfx package for Fedora 10?
--
This is an email sent via The Fedora Community Portal https://fcp.surfsite.org
https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=314230&topic_id=65787&forum=10#forumpost314230
If you think, this is spam, please report this to
webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
and/or blame draeath@xxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:56:23 +0100
From: Paul (draeath) <no-reply-gw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: /etc/profile
To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <1bdcc4bdc4a45aad7ed1bd06dc04f17f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
You'll need to run them as a command on a terminal, exactly as was entered
before.
--
This is an email sent via The Fedora Community Portal https://fcp.surfsite.org
https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=314267&topic_id=65777&forum=10#forumpost314267
If you think, this is spam, please report this to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
and/or blame draeath@xxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:24:47 +0100
From: Michael Schwendt
<mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: awesfx missing - can't load soundfonts
To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <20081222102447.0165d198.mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:56:19 +0100, Paul wrote:
> I can't find the awesfx package for Fedora 10, and nothing in the
Fedora or RPMFusion repositories provides the file "*/asfxload" or
"*/sfxload"
>
> These executables are REQUIRED for loading samples into an EMU10k
soundcard's wavetable synth, and hence are required for hardware MIDI
support.
>
> Where did this package go? If I remember, Fedora 8 had it for instance.
I've tried building it myself to no avail.
>
> Does anyone know where I can find an x86_64 awesfx package for Fedora 10?
It's marked "dead.package". See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/405131
I no longer have any SB AWE/EMU10k cards, so
I don't know what is used
to load soundfonts to them nowadays.
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 05:05:19 -0500
From: William Case <billlinux@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: flash-plugin installed and not available
To: Fedora List <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <1229940319.11209.4.camel@CASE>
Content-Type: text/plain
Hi;
I am not getting any sound with my flash plugin.
When I follow the advice from:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Multimedia/Flash
I get the following message from yum:
Package flash-plugin-10.0.15.3-release.i386 installed and not available
Now what?
--
Regards Bill
Fedora 10, Gnome 2.24.2
Evo.2.24.2, Emacs 22.2.1
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:20:00 +0100
From: "Alain Roger" <raf.news@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: fedora login
window
To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using
Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID:
<75645bbb0812220220r23caf50egc696dcf1a921863f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi,
is there a way to have the fedora 10 KDE login window on the standard fedora
10 (with KDE) ?
i find the KDE login nicer than the standard GNOME login window.
thanks a lot.
--
Alain
-----------------------------------------------------------
Windows XP x64 SP2
PostgreSQL 8.3.5 / MS SQL server 2005
Apache 2.2.10
PHP 5.2.6
C# 2005-2008
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20081222/9287985d/attachment.html
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:18:18 +0100
From: Kevin Kofler
<kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?
To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <ginpha$sir$4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Alain Roger wrote:
> For now i just found in Gnome the terminal features nice...lkike
> transparent background... but the menu by itself is horrible as usual :-(
Konsole can also do transparent background (it's set up in your Konsole
color scheme), but only if you have desktop effects enabled in the window
manager (because it's true transparency, not fake transparency).
Kevin Kofler
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:22:04 +0100
From: Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: is KDE dead - did Gnome win?
To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <ginpoc$sir$5@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Mail Lists wrote:
> (1) Are the fedora KDE users moving back to gnome ? ... is KDE dead
> or alive ?
Nope, I'm still using and comaintaining KDE, I don't see how KDE 4.1 is
any
worse than 3.5. Well, there's a couple of missing features, but most of
those are coming back in 4.2. I don't think switching to GNOME makes any
sense, really, but of course you're free to use whatever you prefer, as
always.
Kevin Kofler
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:44:59 +0000
From: John Austin <ja@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: fedora login window
To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using
Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <1229942699.3546.40.camel@tarifa>
Content-Type: text/plain
On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 11:20 +0100, Alain Roger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there
a way to have the fedora 10 KDE login window on the standard
> fedora 10 (with KDE) ?
> i find the KDE login nicer than the standard GNOME login window.
> thanks a lot.
>
> --
> Alain
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> Windows XP x64 SP2
> PostgreSQL 8.3.5 / MS SQL server 2005
> Apache 2.2.10
> PHP 5.2.6
> C# 2005-2008
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> Guidelines:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
I just set
DISPLAYMANAGER="KDE"
in /etc/sysconfig/desktop
and then init 3;init 5 or a reboot
I have this in mine
Pretty sure that its not all necessary !!
tarifa ~ 1001# cat /etc/sysconfig/desktop
DISPLAYMANAGER="KDE"
WINDOWMANAGER="XFCE"
DISPLAY="KDE"
DESKTOP="XFCE"
John
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:54:12 +0000
From: Anne Wilson <annew@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PackageKit has eaten my system (again!)
To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using
Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <200812221054.16936.annew@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
On Monday 22 December 2008 00:03:48 Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Except that he is trying to install yum. ;)
Duh! shouldn't work when I'm tired. Sorry!
Anne
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url
:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20081222/18f03899/attachment.bin
------------------------------
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 58, Issue 254
********************************************
|
