On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Right? They have a right to do what-ever they want. I never argued >> otherwise. >> > Then you should not be getting "annoyed". Maybe disappointed...but > certainly not annoyed. >> Question is - should Fedora go along with their decision, and support >> their semi-broken RPMs, half-working SELinux support, missing upstream >> kernel support and their decision to keep certain features Windows-only. >> FWIW my vote is a (big) no - Fedora's resources will be better spent on >> qemu-kvm and virt-*. >> >> > What do you mean "should Fedora go along with their decision"? Fedora > isn't supporting anything with regards to VMware and VMware isn't giving > any consideration to Fedora. I think you have created a relationship > where none exists. Sight. The OP talked about reporting SELinux issues w/ VMWare to bugzilla.redhat.com. This constitute spending Fedora resources (read: Fedora's SELinux maintainer's time) on supporting VMWare's decision. - Gilboa -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
