On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 1:29 AM, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Mikkel L. Ellertson > <mikkel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Only if using a stock config is does not pose a security problem. >> The config file is included in the RPM. The postinstall script can >> then activate the service. But it is a much better policy to let the >> user activate the service them self. The exceptions are services >> that do not accept connections from the outside world, and are >> needed for system operation. (Cron, syslog, etc.) > > I have no idea what you are trying to say here. I don't think it > addresses the original poster at all. > > The original post was about a suspected change in how services are > handled at package install time in F10 compared to F9. Nothing in the > package install scripts have changed. Those scripts have not > changed..so the original poster's interpretation of the system > response is most likely wrong and he needs to look elsewhere. > > -jef Hi, I might be wrong about it that F9 had it but i'm absolutely positive that F8 had it. F9 never worked well for me. The situation was: I install MySQL (and apache + php) then on the next boot MySQL and Apache where just on! that was the behaviour. i don't know if that was a bug back then or it's a bug right now or am i dreaming all of this and was it never the behaviour of any fedora release? -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
