On Suturday, 7 Dec 2008 00:59:12 -0400, "Armin Moradi" <feng.shaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote : > linuxguy123, > > I think you are mixing up the free (as in speech) mind-set, versus the > proprietary mind-set of > the-company-has-to-fix-everything-and-I-just-have-to-sit-back-and-relax. > > Free software works differently. You mean, by grabbing the sources from each project web site. Yeah, I agree. But if I was to make a distro, I'd like to make it a point of consistency so that users of the unified set of packages are not disappointed from one distro version to the other. And if that means sticking to some pervious versions of packages, until at least an update path for the users is clearly elaborated, so then be it. After all, I wouldn't be doing that for money, isn't it ? Why would I have to show off the latest in my distro if some of the latest have shortcomings ? Only for showing off ? Not even getting money in doing so ? Nah, not worth it. And I wouldn't like to treat my users as beta testers. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
