Linuxguy123 wrote: >> That's because proprietary drivers are not, have never been and >> will never be supported in Fedora. > > Yeah, but Fedora is responsible for shipping PRODUCTION READY stuff. Really? I thought Fedora was about advancing the state of open source software. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Overview starts with: Fedora is all about freedom and rapid innovation And sometimes that leaves closed source, proprietary vendors behind. There's not much Fedora can do about that. If Fedora waited for all of the closed source vendors to catch up, a lot of things would be held back. With a 6 month release cycle, there simply isn't time for that. > I'm an end user. Should I have to look at code and regression stuff > to figure out what changed as to why folderview doesn't work. If you want bugs fixed, it certainly helps the process if you can determine what piece of code needs to be fixed. That does not necessarily mean finding the specific line or block of code, but the software that's responsible for it -- be it folderview or the nvidia driver. Short of doing that, you have to wait for someone else to do that work. Since there is no cost to the software, you really can't demand that anyone else fix your bugs. (Though I've certainly found the bugs I've reported to generally get fixed a lot quicker with open source software than with closed source.) > And if folderview doesn't work with nvidia hardware, I'd hardly call > that PRODUCTION READY. I'd call it an nvidia bug. Please report upstream. -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ It is impossible to enjoy idling thoroughly unless one has plenty of work to do. -- Jerome K. Jerome
Attachment:
pgpArOTVze7NG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
