On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 10:08:04 -0500, Linuxguy123 wrote: > On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 17:49 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 09:19:04 -0500, Linuxguy123 wrote: > > > > > $ rawstudio > > > rawstudio: error while loading shared libraries: libexiv2.so.0: cannot > > > open shared object file: No such file or directory > > > > > > $ yum list exiv* > > > Loaded plugins: downloadonly, kmdl, priorities, refresh-packagekit > > > 0 packages excluded due to repository priority protections > > > Installed Packages > > > exiv2.i386 > > > 0.17.1-1.fc10 > > > installed > > > exiv2-devel.i386 > > > 0.17.1-1.fc10 > > > installed > > > exiv2-libs.i386 > > > 0.17.1-1.fc10 > > > installed > > > > And where do you demonstrate that one of these packages actually > > provides libexiv2.so.0? > > Sorry. > > $ rpm -ql exiv2-devel | grep lib > /usr/lib/libexiv2.so > /usr/lib/pkgconfig/exiv2.pc > > I renamed it to libexiv2.so.0 and rawstudio runs. > > > > It isn't provided in these packages. It's ancient. Most recent you can get > > is libexiv2.so.1 (F9) and libexiv2.so.4 (F10). > > Apparently its not ancient, its still being shipped. No, it isn't. Please don't spread misinformation. Other users find such things via search engines and then are misguided. libexiv2.so -- if renamed to libexiv2.so.0 -- is not equivalent to libexiv2.so.0. It's still only a symlink to libexiv2.so.4, which is not guaranteed to be compatible in its interface. Consider yourself lucky that some parts seem to be compatible enough to serve as a work-around. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
