Tim wrote:
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 17:36 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Do you have any ESTABLISHED that you wouldn't ACCEPT? I just take them
all.
Can't think of any at the moment, though there's some RELATED traffic
that I might have trepidations about. I don't know what the rules
consider to be related, but I'd be annoyed at something like the
following (which does happen).
Yes, RELATED is a different issue, and is not made easier by a lack of
documentation and configuration tools. I would love to have an easy to use tool
to tune that and save configuration.
e.g. You browse to a website, and it connects back to you to look at
your identd service (if you have one), regardless of whether you're
logging on or browsing anonymously.
I want "related" to mean appropriately related traffic to what I'm
doing, not anything back from something that I've made some sort of
connection to.
And I can well imagine parents might relent and allow IM chat, but block
the ports used for webcams and IM file transferring.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
