On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 15:14:59 -0600 "Arthur Pemberton" <pemboa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > How is Sugar related to KDE though? It's not. However, I SUSPECT that there might be more people who want KDE-3.5 than Sugar. It's worth exploring. It could be just me but I don't think so due to discussions that I have seen on other forums. My impression is that there is a fairly sizable group of 3.5x users who won't change to 4. > > > Again, I am not knocking KDE4. However, it is a radical > > departure from something that I have been using since > > RH-9, possibly earlier. > > KDE 3.5 was fairly different than what was in RH-9 if I > remember correctly. Not really IIRC. Moreover, this is the first KDE release since then without an upgrade path. New releases have added features and horsepower but have been consistent in approach. > > > This is an attempt to protect the innocent and > uninformed. The very people who shouldn't be logging in > as root. Those who have enough information to make the > decision for themselves generally can make the switch > themselves as well. > That makes sense until you have a bunch of problems with a new installation and need to figure out how to make the edit to log into a UI as boot. It's not up to Fedora to protect me from my own stupidity - that would be a losing proposition from the outset ;-) -- "Neither Lifestyle nor Agenda" http://www.tips-Q.com -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
