On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: some feedback on fedora 10 > From: Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx> > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Date: 12/01/2008 04:32 PM > >> >> These list messages are archived publicly, and that any mail addresses >> in the message bodies, including yours if present, are therefore visible >> to spam harvesters. OTOH the addresses in the messages headers are >> obscured by the list archiving software to make this more difficult. >> >> Rahul's request is completely reasonable. >> >> poc >> > > The mail archive software automatically parses e-mail addresses and > obfuscates them enough to be safe from spammers. See for yourself: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2008-December/msg00208.html > > Or check this reply in the archives. Your email was used in my Thunderbird > Quote add-on. Exactly why I didn't give a hoot about Rahul's hurt feelings. The fact that a Fedora representive is unaware of this and/or wasting list bandwidth over it is both hillarious and pathetic. > > Is this thread not derailed enough already? Apparently not. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ L. Friedman netllama@xxxxxxxxx LlamaLand https://netllama.linux-sxs.org -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
