On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 13:35:12 -0500, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Sorry, I assume that the QA process includes someone actually installing > the application and seeing that it works. I would rather see things sit > in updates-testing until someone is willing to sign off that they > actually have been at least smoke tested? That doesn't mean that filing bugs to get problems fixed (or at least tracked) is a bad idea. That applies to any bug, not just selinux ones. > It doesn't need to be some maintainer who does that, anyone who is going > to use the package can take a moment to do the sign off, assuming that > there's a process to identify people as capable of installing a package > with selinux enabled (lots of folks), and willing to do so (still > hopefully a non-empty set). There should be something in the packaging guidelines or the package review process about testing with selinux enabled. (If there isn't already.) > If Fedora is going to ship with SElinux enabled, it also should be > working. Just like anything else. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
