> There are many Linux flash filesystems, but Fedora does not support any > of them. If you are using an ATA, CFA or SCSI attached solid state disk then that aspect of file systems is really irrelevant. Raw flash devices require management by the OS via things such as JFFS. ATA flash manages such matters internally and all wear levelling is really down to the drives which use various differing algorithms of differing quality (in part because everyone has patents on their own algorithm). > Personally, I'd take XFS and set the "noatime" mount option. XFS caches noatime is a good idea but other than that I would expect similar results on any journalled file system. If you will be doing backups or using mail clients with local storage, or anything else relying on atime then 'relatime' will give much of the same reduction in I/O but keep these things working sanely. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
