On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Jerry Feldman <gaf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/04/2008 02:56 PM, Dave Ihnat wrote: >> >> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 12:31:51PM -0700, Craig White wrote: >> >>> >>> because... >>> <snip> >>> >> >> And: >> >> 4. The Ubuntu life cycle is much longer than Fedora, making it more >> stable for production environments. >> > > I don't particularly buy that argument Even though, I believe that was the major factor. I would be strongly against an OEM putting Fedora on regular user desktops anyways. Ubuntu has a much more versatile user support infrastructure, and a lot more stable pace than Fedora. Both of these reasons lead to me not using it, but are also good reasons for an OEM (especially a lazy one) to use. So Ubuntu on Dells is a good thing. That itself does not make it better than Fedora. Frankly, Fedora and Ubuntu are different enough that I don't think they can be compared at all to say that either is better. -- Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
