On 03.11.2008 19:18, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 11:53 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 09:33:53 -0800,
Jonathan Ryshpan <jonrysh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I recently accepted an update of the Livna repository info from
livna-release-9-1.noarch to livna-release-9-2.noarch . This caused the
availability of a large number of updates from the RPMFusion repo.
Should I trust these updates? The GPG signature for the RPMFusion repo
is not right now installed.
That is up to you.
Livna is combining with a few other repositories to form RPMFusion and they
have recently started the cutover.
Of note is that libdvdcss isn't going to make the move to RPMFusion and people
who want that will need to get it someplace else.
Thanks for your quick replies. I don't have any trouble with the Livna
repo
Note that all packages that have been moved to RPM Fusion will likely
vanish from the Livna repos soon, to give those people a heads up that
haven't heard about bright RPM Fusion future yet. But that should just
be a minority of people, as normally everyone will get transferred to
RPM Fusion automatically.
I thought that when I
upgraded to livna-release-9-2 this would install the proper security
certificates, etc. [...]
That didn't happen on purpose -- importing the keys automatically would
have been easily possible, but that's a bit like changing the door of a
house and the keys for the door on the keyring without telling the one
that owns the house/the keyring.
Livna expressed its trust in the keys by signing the rpmfusion-release
packages with the Livna key. So if you up to now trusted the stuff you
got from Livna then you can consider to do so now as well.
CU
knurd
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
