lux wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 4:18 AM, Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx > <mailto:hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > I am having trouble getting Fedora 9 (x86_64 live cd) to read my SD > card using a built-in Ricoh MMC reader on an HP 8510 laptop (Core 2 > Duo). I get mmcblk0 and mmcblk0p1 in /dev but any attempt to read the > card fails. I see an icon in Nautilus but after opening it and a brief > pause I get an error "Can't read superblock". Also, any attempt to > inspect the device in parted or fdisk also fail. They both complain > about lables but I'm not sure if they are talking about filesystem > labels or volume lables. I can't see why the latter would cause an > issue. I tried the mklabel command in parted setting it to msdos but > it couldn't complete... I'm in Windows XP right now and it's reading > it fine. > > Along those lines, is it possible to get the UUID of a disk from > windows? > It sounds like it is trying to mount the card as a ext2 file system. I am not sure why that is. As far as the labels, you need to copy the exact message - I don't think it is talking about file system labels. Dumb question - when you are trying to use fdisk, are you using mmcblk0 or mmcblk0p1? You should be using mmcblk0. > > I have similar problem on HPnx500 with a built-in sd card reader > > After insert sd card, dmesg only show > > tifm_core: MMC/SD card detected in socket 0:0 > > nothing happening in /dev > > here is output of lsmod|egrep 'sd|timf' > > > sdhci 17540 0 > tifm_sd 12552 0 > mmc_core 40604 2 sdhci,tifm_sd > tifm_core 10268 3 tifm_ms,tifm_sd,tifm_7xx1 > sd_mod 26008 5 > scsi_mod 122876 4 usb_storage,sg,libata,sd_mod > > > how to get this fixed? > You have a different chip set from the OP - you have the TI chip set, and he has the Ricoh chip set. They use different drivers. I am not sure why you are having problems with the TI drivers - they have been working correctly in my Toshiba laptop. I forget the first kernel that they started working without tweaking the registers before loading the modules, but I think it was in FC6. You should file a bug report because it may be something to your specific setup and it will probably not be fixed otherwise - the developers do not know there is a problem if the people it is not working for do not file a bug report. Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
