On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:08:57 -0400, Todd Denniston wrote: > Frank Cox wrote, On 10/20/2008 10:50 PM: >> On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:10:57 -0500 >> Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> I didn't find anything helpful with a quick Google search for "flash >>> 10 multitheaded" but maybe it is an issue with multi-core machines? >> >> That's a thought. I have never been able to watch CNN videos on this >> dual-core machine, even with Flash 10, but they work on the single-core >> machine that's sitting beside it. Both running F8. >> >> > > have you considered/ever tried forcing flash &| the browser &| X > processes to operate only on one processor (core) with taskset, just to > see if it may be a context switching/processor cache bashing problem? > > > I have noticed on the dual Xeon 1.50GHz W/512MB I use, that if I lock X > to the second processor, when visiting animated sites like > http://www.intellicast.com/National/Radar/Current.aspx?animate=true The > whole system is smother and the animation is less glitchy. [with out > locking X pulls ~85%cpu (of combined cpus), > with locking X pulls ~10-50%cpu (of combined cpus), on that page > after it > self reloads.] > > -- > Todd Denniston > Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC Crane) Harnessing the > Power of Technology for the Warfighter I know it's cliche and I hate to say it, but it works flawlessly at work in Windows XP on a 2 processor Xeon. So I'm inclined to believe it's a problem with the linux version of flash. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
