On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:22 AM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht <wolfgang.rupprecht+gnus200810@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Before flash 10, almost any page containing flash used to segfault my firefox 32 on F8 (Intel quadcore). With flash 10, I am not having any issue whatsoever.
I am also not using libflash support or nspluginwrapper anymore.
In theory you don't need them. It didn't seem to hurt anything when I
"Richard Shaw" <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> I have both the i386 and x86_64 installed on my F8 machine. I'm not sure
> if I still need it though...
installed them temporarily, but your mileage may vary.
This problem is beginning to sound a bit like a timing problem, with
some folks seeing it and others not.
-
Before flash 10, almost any page containing flash used to segfault my firefox 32 on F8 (Intel quadcore). With flash 10, I am not having any issue whatsoever.
I am also not using libflash support or nspluginwrapper anymore.
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
