Re: gimp 2.6 for F8?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



on 10/08/2008 03:41 PM Kam Leo wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 6:02 AM, oleksandr korneta <atenrok@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
on 10/07/2008 03:16 AM Kam Leo wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 10:41 PM, oleksandr korneta <atenrok@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
on 10/06/2008 02:09 AM Kam Leo wrote:
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 11:03 PM, wwp <subscript@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello there,


is anyone aware of any gimp 2.6 package for Fedora 8?


Regards,

--
wwp
Google Search:

http://www.nabble.com/GIMP-2.6.0-for-Fedora-8-9-(Was:-Re:-ANNOUNCE:-GIMP-2.6.0)-p19815879.html

error: Can't install gimp-2:2.6.0-1jv.fc8@i386: no package provides
libgio-2.0.so.0

fedora 8

--
regards,
Oleksandr Korneta

I'm running F9 x86_64 and F8 i386 on x86_64 hardware, should this matter.

Please put your thinking cap on. If you visited the site referenced
above to get gimp-2.6 you might have noticed  multiple packages were
available for downloading. The other packages were put there for a
reason!  You need install glib2-2.18 to satisfy the libgio dependency.

sorry, my bad. I actually downloaded all of them into same directory and did
"sudo smart install gimp-2.6.0-1jv.fc8.i386.rpm" expecting that smart will
pickup the dependencies from right there. Didn't realize that you have to
put the names of all the packages as an argument.

thanks for being patient with me

--
regards,
Oleksandr Korneta

Smart is a fine tool for updating, upgrading and managing packages.
However, you would have gotten faster results using rpm; e.g. "sudo
rpm -ivh *.rpm".


maybe, but smart has the advantage which I like. In case you have a local *.rpm with unsatisfied dependencies on your system, installing this rpm through "smart install" will make smart pull all of those from the repositories on the fly (provided they are available there), instead of spitting the angry error messages into STDOUT like "rpm -ivh" does. That was my motivation.



--
regards,
Oleksandr Korneta

I'm running F9 x86_64 and F8 i386 on x86_64 hardware, should this matter.

/The nice thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from./


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux