Re: Using all of 4GB RAM... questions and Vista versus Linux...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 08:54 -0400, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> I have a new HP hdx laptop with a Core Duo T8100 processor and 4 GB of
> RAM.
> 
> $ uname -a
> Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.26.3-14.fc8 #1 SMP Wed Sep 3 03:40:05
> EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
> 
> Even though I have 4GB of RAM installed, Linux appears to only be using
> 3GB of it.
> 
> $ free -t
>              total       used       free     shared    buffers
> cached
> Mem:       3106944     777056    2329888          0      60608
> 419608
> -/+ buffers/cache:     296840    2810104
> Swap:      2040244          0    2040244
> Total:     5147188     777056    4370132
> 
> I've read in other posts to this group that the cause of this is that
> the BIOS remaps the some (1GB) of memory to serve as address space for
> PCI devices, thus creating a memory "hole".   
> 
> I understand that some BIOSes allow one to remap those devices elsewhere
> in the map.  My BIOS does NOT allow that option.
> 
> Questions:
> 
> a) On machines that do not allow PCI remapping, is the processor
> physically disallowed from accessing that 4GB of RAM ?  Ie have the
> address lines from the processor been disconnected from that RAM due to
> being connected to the PCI devices ?
> 
> b) How do XP and Vista handle this ? Are they limited to 3GB of RAM
> too ?
> 
> c) I am running the 32 bit version of Linux.  Would it make any
> difference to my RAM access if I ran the 64 bit version ?

Overall, the issue is that you are running a 32-bit version of Linux. In
order to take advantage of the entire 4GB you need to either:

1) Run a 64-bit version

2) Run the 32-bit PAE kernel (PAE stands for Physical Address
Extensions)

At this point, it's preferable (IMHO) to just run the 64-bit version if
you can stand to re-install. You will get better results overall in
terms of performance compared to the PAE kernel and most all of the
issues around 32-bit / 64-bit compatibility have been resolved or worked
around. See the F9 release notes for details on these.

...and yes, this also applies to Windows systems. You have to run 64-bit
versions of Windows XP or Vista to see the full 4GB as well.

Cheers,

Chris



--
==================================
By all means marry;
If you get a good wife, you'll be happy.
If you get a bad one, you'll become a philosopher.

--Socrates

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux