On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 06:33:20PM -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >So I wanted to know about the public opinions on which one is better, Git or > >Subversion as versioning control system (VCS?). If you can, please come up > >with some reasons too! Like what benefits do you think your preferred one has > >that the other one doesn't offer! > > http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/GitSvnComparsion I started with CVS and soon after moved to SVN, which was quite an improvement. However, I recently learned git and would *never* go back. For starters, it's *much* faster than any other system. The use of branches is completely phenomenal. And the ability to quickly set up and host a repository for anyone with just some file copies to any HTTP share is worth its weight in gold. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
pgpBnIryRSrDV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
