On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 09:50:58 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:07:04 -0500, > Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I was thinking of trying the same thing with x86_64 but I don't think I want > > to pull in all of the i386 packages and was wondering how the list of i386 > > packages was selected for normal x86_64 repos? > > I thought about this issue for a bit and I think the answer is to include > all i386, i686 packages that provide something that is not provided by > any x86_64 package. Previously I was looking for some way to flag i386 > specific stuff, but that was thinking too narrowly. > I am not sure of the best way to do the above, but I think I will be able to > get something to work. I'll also need to be a little careful of version > differences as my i386 and x86_64 rpms may have a couple of packages out > of sync because of checking koji at different times. That should be a solveable > problem as well. You can take a look at the current tool that fills the biarch repos. It's "mash", written in Python, and in the Fedora repo. The basic pkg selection scheme is to add all -devel pkgs and their dependencies, plus packages from a whitelist and minus packages from a blacklist. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
