Patrick O'Callaghan writes:
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 22:05 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:Rahul Sundaram writes: > Sam Varshavchik wrote:> >> However, nothing stops you from installing 32 bit Firefox, which will >> run just fine on a 64 bit Fedora install. > > You don't have to do that. Fedora by default installs nspluginwrapper > which works with the 32-bit plugins on 64-bit arch. It also has the > advantage of adding more stability and security (via SELinux policy) by > separating the plugins into different process.Maybe, but I was never able to get it to work. Installing nspluginwrapper didn't seem to have any effect. Flash never showed up as a registered plugin in Firefox, and there was absolutely no feedback whatsoever, regarding what the problem might be.Do you have libflashsupport installed? Note that on 64-bit systems you need both the i386 and x86_64 versions. (BTW, this has to be one of the most frequenty asked questions on this list).
That might be the reason. I do not have any 32 bit stuff installed, and have "exclude=*.i386 *.i586 *.i686" in yumconf. Installing any 32 bit stuff adds so much bloat, that it's just not worth it.
Attachment:
pgpdhvp4DriNx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
