On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 09:34 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 09:11 -0400, Mike Burger wrote: > > As I said...I don't agree with it...I'm just saying that I understand > > the thinking behind it. > > Sorry, but I think you don't. You might want to read Alan Cox's message > on the fedora-test list: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2008-September/msg00314.html which indicates that the motivation is much more to do with cleaning up code and APIs. I fact security isn't mentioned. > > poc > It's still a stupid idea. There's no good reason to get rid of the vt consoles; they've been there for a very long time on rh, I use them all the time. As does alot of other people. As one other user pointed out on the link that *you provided, the lack of vt consoles is the number one problem with another distro, according to it's users. LX -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
