Re: Fedora 8 and 9 updates re-enabled

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 10:16 -0400, Dave Feustel wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 08:30:27AM -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 23:34 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > In a few hours, updates for Fedora 8 and Fedora 9 will start hitting
> > > mirrors.  These updates are designed to transition users from our old
> > > repo locations to new locations that have all our updates re-signed with
> > > a new set of keys.  
> > > 
> > > Most users will simply need to apply the offered updates, and later
> > > apply any further updates, and verify/import the new GPG key.
> > > 
> > > The process to getting new updates is two stage.
> > > 
> > > Stage 1) Users configured to get updates from existing repos will see a
> > > small set of updates available in the next few hours/days.  These
> > > updates include fedora-release, PackageKit, gnome-packagekit, and unique
> > > (for Fedora 8, only fedora-release is offered).  These updates should be
> > > applied as soon as possible.
> > > 
> > > Stage 2) Once the above updates have been applied, your update tools
> > > (yum, PackageKit, pirut) will see a new repository and a larger set of
> > > updates available.  This is your new standard flow of updates, that will
> > > continue to see new updates as the lifetime of Fedora 8 and 9 progress.
> > > 
> > > There will be further milestones in the future that involve redirection
> > > of release package repos to match that of updates, and removing of old
> > > gpg key from rpm trust.
> > > 
> > > For more details and an FAQ, please see
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Enabling_new_signing_key
> > I can't make this work. No matter what I do there is a missing
> > dependency reported for yum-utils of yum >= 3.2.19. My yum is 3.2.17.1.
> > How do we fix this?
> 
I'm wondering why the old key is not being directly disabled/removed
after installing the new one. <conspiracy mode> Now packages signed with
the old key can still be installed and could come from an untrusty
source </conspiracy mode> Or do we have to wait for all the packages to
be resigned?

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux