Re: Secrecy and user trust

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bill Davidsen wrote:


>
>>
>> If the public/private key methods employed today are as easy to
>> penetrate and subvert as some seem to be claiming then one has to
>> question why  it hasn't already been done.
>>
> It has already been proved to be possible, so discussion of how easy
> it is or way is irrelevant, at least to me.
???  It has?  So, what was done?  Was the signing key of Fedora
compromised?  Was a replacement key public key generated and
distributed?  Were packages signed by the replacement key distributed? 

What was "proven".

>
> The new public key could be distributed from the master Red Hat
> servers, not from mirrors, which would allow validation of the content
> by the validity of the SSL certificate. Once a trusted signature is
> available, all other packages, from mirror or torrent, could be
> properly validated.
"Could"...how?
>
> While this is inconvenient, it is also as secure as the original, and
> not readily vulnerable to attacks in the distribution, since middlemen
> are not involved. And once the key is out for a few days, and many
> users have it and can quickly compare it to any other key distributed
> by other means, then it can be sent out in a more convenient manner if
> people really feel the need to trade some security for ease of use.
>
A whole bunch of people are wringing their hands over nothing.  I
suppose if you want to continue doing that that is your choice. 

The strange things is that none of this would have come up if the
servers of Fedora hadn't been penetrated by some method which nobody on
this list is privy to...but can spend endless hours on idle speculation
and fear mongering. 

[WOT comment] I suspect that those fear peddlers, if located in the US,
will also be voting for the Republican candidate.  :-)

-- 
Some people's mouths work faster than their brains. They say things they
haven't even thought of yet.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux