Re: Ntpdate fails to start

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paul Smith wrote:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Paul Smith <phhs80@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
At booting, ntpdate fails to start, and also the following command
fails:

# /sbin/service ntpdate start
ntpdate: Synchronizing with time server:                   [FAILED]
#

The log messages are:

Sep  7 12:50:50 localhost ntpdate[2908]: the NTP socket is in use,
exiting

Any ideas?
service ntpd status

Should show you that the ntp daemon is already running.

You can't run both ntpd (the server) and ntpdate (the client) at the
same time.
Thanks, Stuart and Edward. Got this:

# /sbin/service ntpd status
ntpd (pid 2059) is running...
#

ntpdate tries to start at booting. So, should I disable it? Which one
of the two should I have running in order to have always a correct
time on my computer?

either, but not both. I suggest ntpd, particularly if you run more than one
machine. A local time server can be specified with the "prefer" (from
memory) option, and that will be used if available. See the man pages on
this. The nice thing about running your own server is that if your network
connection drops your machines will all stay together, handy if you are
trying to match logs from one machine to another.

If you run just one machine it probably doesn't matter.
Thanks, Bill. I am running only one machine.

How can I remove one of them from trying to start at booting?

Paul


You may actually want both.

On a typical setup ntpdate runs first (and exits) and syncs the clock close but not exactly on. If this is not done and the time is off by more than a certain amount then ntpd *WON'T* be able to sync things, and will exit with an error.

Then after ntpdate gets things close, then ntpd keeps things in proper sync.

stop both ntpd and ntpdate, and then start ntpdate and then start ntpd and if both succeed things is likely correct and ntpdate runs and then exits.

In F8 ntpdate is ran in the ntpd script to sync things in, and then ntpd is started, they could have separated it in F9. The only way ntpdate would be sensible as a replacement is *if* something is running it every so often to keep things close, otherwise one the machine came up things would start to drift, and things would get worse the longer things were up.

                                Roger

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux