On Friday 29 August 2008, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >Lyvim Xaphir wrote: >> On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 13:47 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >>> Lyvim Xaphir wrote: >>>> What in the hell are you talking about? The sentence was a question, >>>> not a statement, in text, no less. How obtuse do you have to be in >>>> order to miss that? >>> >>> You can always phrase a question and still presume things. >> >> However the only person that knows the presumption for sure is the one >> phrasing the question. > >In many cases, it is quite obvious that the question is not serious >especially when some people use that often as a technique in a debate. >Feel free to jump up and down and claim otherwise. > >Rahul And the simple fact that those of us who want a working java are going to the sun site, getting the latest jre and installing it, never again to click on an ICED TEA update in yumex. Really, I think that says it all. You for legal reasons are defending an emasculated version, but the final say on what gets run is us, its our machine. Sue us? I doubt it. :) -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Your wise men don't know how it feels To be thick as a brick. -- Jethro Tull, "Thick As A Brick" -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
