Re: strange error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:33:17 +0000, g wrote:

>> I *think* I've seen a claim somewhere that you can use it with KDE
> 
> that was noted on one of pages.
> 
>> One drawback, so far, is that I haven't found out how to put together a
>> whole list of things to remove and then tell it to do so, all in one
>> fell swoop.
> 
> that is what i liked about md, check away what you do not want, then
> dump it.

	The package kit shows so many items under "Other" and 
"Programming" that I told it "apply" without them; ran yum update; and 
came back.

	Moderately bad news : the nice info under other rubrics, 
particularly the required-by tab, are entirely lacking in these. There is 
no way I can find for anybody who doesn't already know to tell what can 
be cut away safely and what not, except by trial and disaster. 

   I did notice a speech synthesis app, and tried removing that; it told 
me that would cost me four other such apps, which suited me fine. (I'm 
pretty sure an older package kit *had* told me they were removable; if 
some would-be clever developer has *removed* this function, it has to be 
the bone-headedest decision I've seen in Fedora.)

	If I could only somehow get pirut, it would help a lot. Yum 
doesn't have any sort of force option, afaict; I thought maybe pirut'd be 
in livna. I installed the F9 livna rpm, and tried "yum install pirut," 
but it still only told me I already had packagekit.

	What's so wrong with having both?? One of my PCs does; but I 
can't remember how I got it there ...

	[LATER] Having installed Opera on the EeePC, I managed to google 
up a pirut noarch rpm at rpmfind; downloaded it; tried to -ivh it; got a 
dependency for "comps-extras"; told yum to install that, which it did; 
tried rpm -ivh again -- and got a thing I haven't seen before : a notice 
that it *conflicts* with some *unnamed* file in packagekit.

	Other people online claim to have removed package kit; I'm going 
to try.

	At this point, I'm down to 50.2% file usage, according to baobab, 
and can start emulating amorous porcupines while I copy data of my own 
back in. But I'd a lot rather pare that down somewhere well below 50%, 
and then try.

-- 
Beartooth Staffwright, PhD, Neo-Redneck Linux Convert
Fedora 7, 8 & 9; Alpine 1.10, Pan 0.132; Privoxy 3.0.6;
Dillo 0.8.6, Galeon 2, Epiphany 2, Opera 9, Firefox 2 & 3
Remember I know precious little of what I am talking about.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux