Re: Estimating System wattage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Semcheski wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Christopher Snook <csnook@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You only need massive power supplies in a desktop if you're running high-end
video cards or something else that needs separate power inputs.  Enjoy your
very long UPS runtime.

In my experience, peak power usage can be much higher than the average
power usage.

e.g., at boot time the system uses lots of power to spin up the drives
and fans.  Once their rotational velocity is established, power usage
can drop to 50% of peak and stay down.

This is correct.

The other line of reasoning I've heard for buying an over-sized power
supply is because running the power supply closer to capacity will

This may or may not be correct. What kills most components like that
is heat. If you conduct the heat away, the PS will last a long time.
Running at reduced power helps by not generating as much heat. Sort of.

shorten its life.  Also, power supplies may be more efficient running
at a fraction of their maximum rated capacity.  i.e., a 200 watt power

"May" is definitely the watchword here. SMPSs like a minimum load. Below
that, they lose regulation, and some will explode. So, many PSs include
a minimum load inside them. This minimum load is absolute waste of
energy. Running an SMPS at very light load results in low efficiency.
I'm not an expert with UPSs, but I'm sure they use some sort of SMPS
to generate a sort of "stepped sine wave", and suffer from some of
the same issues. Anyway, using an ordinary PC power supply which
is way overrated can result in low efficiency.

supply delivering 150 watts of power is less efficient than a 450 watt
power supply delivering 150 watts of power.  Maybe someone who really
knows can respond to this point.

Mike



--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux