* Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> [20080825 03:08]: > Jeff Spaleta wrote: >> >> Did we have a communication problem? Maybe. > > You make it sound like it was something in the past. I'd say a week and a half ago fits squarely in the definition of "past". > Does anyone know yet whether or not the intrusion was due to a > software vulnerability in code we are all running? You *assume* that this may be the case. You are aware that social engineering is one of the most common entry vectors, right? Not saying that is what it was, just pointing out that when you start making assumptions based on not knowing where you are, or where you are going, you're likely going to end up more lost than when you started. > More relevant, does someone know this when the rest of us still > don't? And your point being? Those investigating the incident are likely going to know most (besides the perpetrator) and there will likely be legal constraints on what they can and can not say. (Or they'd have said something by now.) Law's a bitch like that you know. The majority of us just live with it. You may want to write your congress representative to have the law changed so it's not considered interfering with ongoing investigations, divulging random things to a select few loudmouths shouting "Open Source! Community!" Just a thought... /Anders -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
