On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 21:13 +0000, g wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Jeff Spaleta wrote: > <snip> > > The specific current situation aside for a moment. As a Board member, > > I am interested in thinking about a better mechanism of communication > > i see nothing wrong with way it is now. Do you consider shouting "fire" in a fully crowded theater and to leave people alone in the resulting panic to be an appropriate means? It's at least how I perceived Paul's mail and the subsequent "non-/dis-information policy" FPB, FESCO and RH have exhibited. IMO, the question on which additional/alternative means to inform the public would have been appropriate can not be answered before somebody finally informs the public about what has happened. One thing is for sure: This incident made a structural weakness of "the Fedora system" apparent: Centralism. Whatever might have happened it effectively paralyzed Fedora. > > I do not want to go into this too deeply until the current situation > > has been resolved. > > maybe you should have waited? ;o) Yes, he likely better should have. Ralf -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
