On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 17:03 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 17:25 -0400, William Case wrote: > > Hi Patrick; > > > > On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 16:26 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 15:02 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: > > > > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > [snip] [snip] > > Bill, we may be going off at a tangent here since I really haven't > attempted to answer your original question, but the interfaces are > always going to be there (assuming the drivers are loaded). What changes > is whether they are marked UP or not. The state of each interface is > internal to the kernel, all the various commands do is manipulate it or > report it. > > Also, I'm not sure what you mean by "removed the ifconfig". On advice in an earlier thread, it was suggested that ifconfig was interfering and that I had no use for it. That I should move it aside so that it would not be found. I moved it to a dir I keep in root for such things -- /root/MoveAsides. That action did get NM reworking, but the service called 'network' remains running apparently. My problems are all those annoying little gnome issues I listed in my original post. All of which seemed to have started when I turned NM off then on again. My main objective is to get my networking working properly with no extra programs or processes hanging around. I want -- need -- to start poking around my network setup to learn networking. I want to make sure that there is a direct correlation between my poking and any network breakdowns so I can trace back what I shouldn't have done. -- Regards Bill; Fedora 9, Gnome 2.22.3 Evo.2.22.3.1, Emacs 22.2.1 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
