On Saturday 16 August 2008 18:31:25 Antonio Olivares wrote: > > > Keep it up guys - I am one who does appreciate how > > > > things > > > > > move forward. > > > > I second your comment :) It is becoming better, not yet at > > a comfort level, still missing the Digital Clock from KDE > > 3.5.X, but it is working better and it is coming around. > > I better clarify the comfort level part. Not as comfortable as I would be > if using KDE 3.5.X because I cannot customize it like I did before. I > cannot put a quicklaunch like I did before with previous KDE. I can't get > the old LCD clock that I liked very much but it is not there :( That is why > I mean by comfort level. > Most of the customisation is possible in 4.1, though sometimes it takes a little lateral thinking to get it. For those that want it, for instance, it is possible to define a folder view that points to Desktop, run it at full screen, and add Trash and Home icons and anything else they want to feel at home. > It is very workable. Okular is excellent :) It(KDE 4.X) is coming around. > Great work KDE developers. I apologize ahead of time, if I sounded > pessimistic in previous threads. On F9, I use GNOME, but on rawhide, I am > using KDE :) I am seeing the progress. > I'm not running rawhide, but I first installed 4.0 from rawhide before F9 came out. The speed at which it has improved has been, I think, impressive. If Fedora had decided not to go with it in F9 there would have been howls of anger that other distros had 4.x and Fedora doesn't. They cant win. Anne
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
