Tim: >> If you're into classical music, it's woefully inadequate, though. >> e.g. Artist is a vague term, do you apply it to the composer or the >> performer? There aren't the fields necessary for proper >> classification, and the genre tagging's just stupid (a small >> predefined list of number genres, with no free-form entry of type). Patrick O'Callaghan: > Not so. ID3V2 is a lot more flexible, and includes a free-format genre > description. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Id3 Maybe the spec says so, but various clients don't work that way. And you can end up with mismatching ID3 *and* ID3v2 data in the file, not to mention fields not being available to you. Plenty a time I've typed in a genre, on a client that let me do so, only to find it described as something completely different, when I play it elsewhere. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.25.11-97.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
