Re: fc9 install

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks for the "fedora core" -> "fedora" correction. And, to other respondent, I could have phrase that "ham sandwich" better.

I have a couple systems running of FC5. I am trying to upgrade to Fedora 9. Haven't been able to get the Linux boxes to talk to internet, so I downloaded the DVD FC9 iso on my Windows box. Ran sha1sum.exe per download instructions to confirm it matched SHA1SUM pulled from Fedora site.

Burned a DVD. Actually two to be cautious. Verified both.

Put them in DVD/CD drive of Linux box. I ran the media check and it successfully verified. Continuing on, the disk ejects with an error box that say, in text in upper left, "ok" and has a button to push which says, of course, "ok". Both DVDs do this and I tried on two different Linux boxes. Let's just say I'm not getting too many hints out of the process of what might be going on.

I then tried downloading Live CD, verifying, and putting in the same DVD/CD drive on both machines. Appears to boot properly from CD on both Linux boxes.

I looked at the install pages and it seems like my options, given I don't have internet on the Linux yet, are to 1) DVD install/update, 2) LiveCD install/update, 3) a 6 CD download install/update, or 4) a CD with the rest on stick.

My questions are 1) "any suggestions on the DVD install failure", 2) should I just use the LiveCD or should I try the 6 CD version, and 3) I can't find the man pages on exactly where this flash image is ... I only see the DVD and LiveCD.

I am being wary and checking on this forum first as I don't understand what the current problem is and am trying to make sure I pick right path of action in case there is "something odd" about my existing machines on FC5 and/or the DVD (though how it can successfully verify media multiple times and always error when actually starting install is unclear to me).

Linux boxes are HP x4000 and the DVD/CD drives are Lite-On DVD+-R DH-20A3P-08, if it helps. I burned onto DVD-R since they should handle both (?)

Thanks in advance for any advice,
Paul

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 22:20 -0700, Paul Newell wrote:
From reading the fc docs, it appears that this is the mailing list to send questions about installation of fedora core (in the case, FC9).

Before I send email, I want to make sure I have the right mailing list and, if not, would please ask for advice about which mailing list I should be communicating with

It is the place, but it hasn't been Fedora Core for at least two
releases. It's just Fedora now (even though the rpm's have fc9 as part
of their name).

poc


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux