Hi Kevin; On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 01:03 -0400, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > William Case wrote: > > Hi Kevin et al; > > > > It just got stranger; > > > > On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 00:07 -0400, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > >> William Case wrote: > >>> Although my browsers don't work externally they did find > >>> http://192.168.1.1 which gave me a setup page. I didn't change anything > >>> but here is the output: > >>> > >>> LAN > >>> IP Address 192.168.1.1 > >>> Subnet Mask 255.255.255.0 > >>> DHCP Server Enabled Firewall Enabled > >>> > >>> INFORMATION > >>> System Time 2008/08/05 21:28:28 > >>> System Boot Up Time 00000 days 05:17:37 > >>> Connected Clients 3 > >>> Runtime Code Version V2.00.0042 > >>> Boot Code Version V2.00.32 > >>> LAN MAC Address 00-40-F4-91-17-8C > >>> WAN MAC Address 00-40-F4-91-17-8D > >>> > >>> > > > > On re-boot the script messages still show, -- "setting NetworkManger > > waiting for network - failed". Then, "httpd: could not reliably > > determine the servers fully qualified domain name using 127.0.0.1 for > > server name." > > > > The little NetworkManager gui in my notification panel shows a red > > warning with an x and says "No network connection". > > > > Epiphany and FireFox, along with Evolution, start offline. Putting all > > three back online gets them all working. Here is the strange thing. > > Previously when I put Epiphany and Firefox back online as soon as I > > started them again they went off line immediately. This time they > > stayed on. I loaded several fresh pages and everything continued to > > work. > > Something else to look at... What does your network routing look like? > Do you have a proper default route? If not, you won't be able to get > beyond your local subnet. > > /sin/route I have posted the result of route -n earlier. There is nothing interesting there. ]$ route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 > > I'm guessing that if NetworkManager isn't doing it right, its not > getting setup. If not, you could try: > > /sbin/route add -net default gw 192.168.1.1 > Not necessary. 'route -n' already tells me that 192.168.1.1 is my gateway. > (I think that's the correct syntax....) > > > To answer Kevin. Yes the bill is paid. I have one other machine running > > Ubuntu with no problem and another on WindowsXP. > > I was kidding! I figured you were. I didn't take offence -- it is the type of joke I would have used. But it was a good enough question that it made me go and double check that the other two machines were working. Besides, Rogers has a habit of partially turning services off to work on them without telling customers what it is doing. > > > I just shut down and cold rebooted to be sure before sending this post. > > Every thing is still as above. > > Check your network routing tables. If you don't tell the networking how > to get there, it doesn't know. > > > A new wrinkle I didn't report, but now Evolution is asking for IP > > account passwords each time I start it. It had stopped doing that in > > Fedora 9. Remember Kevin, I am getting ISP service. Everything seems to be boiling down to a NetworkManager problem. -- Regards Bill; Fedora 9, Gnome 2.22.3 Evo.2.22.3.1, Emacs 22.2.1 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
