On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 03:04 +0000, Robert wrote: > ...The phrase planned obsolesce comes to mind... I tend to agree. I do see some of Fedora's rapid churn as having some value, but the one month overlap period isn't enough. It's common that the new release is far from ready during that overlap period. And it's common that users may skip one release because it just doesn't work for them. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.25.11-97.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
