Rich Emberson wrote:
> Could someone please post the checksum, md5 or sha1, for the
> Fedora 9 update glibc-common-2.8-8.i386.rpm?
[geo@argosyiayia 0000.0000.downloads]$ sha1sum -b
glibc-common-2.8-8.i386.rpm
4c923b02f21301369aa8d9a1ea6655eb706b9692 *glibc-common-2.8-8.i386.rpm
[geo@argosyiayia 0000.0000.downloads]$ md5sum -b glibc-common-2.8-8.i386.rpm
4d6c4816d55f56366c6c6ba7b5109281 *glibc-common-2.8-8.i386.rpm
[geo@argosyiayia 0000.0000.downloads]$
> I am having a bear of a time downloading the rpm:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2008-July/msg03696.html
as long as i have file, would you like me to send yuo it too? :o))
- --
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
G,
Thank you for the offer.
In the linked message
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2008-July/msg03696.html
I did, in fact, manage to download the glibc-common rpm using curl
repeatedly and targeting a number of mirrors. I was just very
unsure if it had all the right bits. I checked the rpm's
md5 and sha1 against those you provided and they matched.
I just now installed the rpm on my other (backup) machine and
it seems to be ok (login/logout, start/stop X, reboot). So I do not
think I will need to take you up on your generous offer to send me
the glibc-common rpm but thank you again.
Richard
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
