-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Anne Wilson wrote: | On Monday 28 July 2008 20:15:54 Mike Chambers wrote: |> Hi all, |> |> Reading the last couple emails from another thread on maybe new list or |> two, and to segregate the content to them was brought up and have couple |> new list names that might help make sense or to get the ball rolling? |> |> fedora-list(this one) - General Fedora talk, opinions, suggestions, |> comments, distro wars, all that type stuff not support related. |> |> fedora-user-list or fedora-support-list - Bug references, problems with |> software, computer won't boot, email don't work, firefox plugins not |> working, etc.. where problems are asked about and responded to on |> *official releases*. |> |> fedora-testers-list - as is, for testing alpha, beta, preview, rc |> releases when preparing a new release. |> |> fedora-devel-list - as is, for development of fedora, and the rest that |> is currently used on that list. |> |> See the url below for currently created lists already being used.. |> |> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ |> |> Would this help make things better? |> | In theory, yes. In practice, not unless there is moderator support for making | sure that non-support threads go to the relevant list. The users that this situation seriously effects are those still on dial-up and those with limited bandwidth. I think it is very, very, rude to carry on these types of OT discussions under those conditions. They should go private IMO. - -- ~ David -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: --batch iEYEARECAAYFAkiORSQACgkQAO0wNI1X4QGduwCgwEEGcMHtV1TBZHsKPWjVf2ov i7QAoMhp1zDCA9SyqGMwZX42gRSXnXZR =3Eo4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
