On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:57:53AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > Note that some discussions on LWN concerning whether kernel bugs with security > implications were being clearly labelled as such, suggests that the -97 > kernel included security fixes. As such pushing those updates out a bit faster > may have been justified. And -86? And -55? Seems like there was another as well.. Perhaps we need to do security fixes through a different process, rather than just rushing-out security fixes on top of whatever is in HEAD whether it has been tested by users or not... John -- John W. Linville linville@xxxxxxxxxx -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
